蒋春暄：“说我是大数学家没有必要，说我是垃圾也可以” ——蒋春暄教授工作的里程碑、证据与反...

“说我是大数学家没有必要，说我是垃圾也可以。给我一个证明吧！”
“Saying I am a great mathematician is not necessary, saying I am garbage is also fine. But give me a proof!”
-- 蒋春暄教授工作的里程碑、证据与反映〔1956-1982〕
-- Milestones, evidence and reactions to work of Prof. Jiang Chun-xuan
Compiled by Chen I-wan , Advisor, “Committee of Natural Hazard Prediction” of China Geophysics Society (cheniwan@263.net)
作者按∶在此交流的《蒋春暄教授工作的里程碑、证据与反映〔1956-1982〕》，为作者2003年末2004年初用两个多月时间详尽研究大量中国数学界与“蒋春暄现象”有关背景资料基础上的评论文章“征求意见用未定稿”。
当时所研究的资料包括〔1〕蒋春暄1975年至2003年底所有中文与英文的数学论文；〔2〕中国报刊上查到的所有“蒋春暄现象”相关内容的报道与评论；〔3〕1975年5月7日美国哈佛大学桑蒂利教授写给不知名的中国“小人物”蒋春暄的第一封以来蒋春暄与许多国家数学家通讯中收到的所有信件；〔4〕国内外报刊上与蒋春暄所研究的重大课题有关的许多中英文资料。〔5〕有关桑蒂利教授数学领域以及物理领域成就的资料。
为此，在研究“蒋春暄现象”这个专题上，做了相当深入的调查研究，“做了我的家庭作业”〔I have done my homework〕，从而取得了“发言权”。
现整理的该资料公布出来，希望有助于中国数学界年青数学研究者以及中国广大的业余数学爱好者客观认识与评价蒋春暄及其杰出的数学成就，也有益于你们认清数学界某些“大人物”与方舟子之流在“蒋春暄现象”问题上的种种误导。
一旦你们也能够全面深入了解上述情况，读者自然也能够得出与我相同的结论∶蒋春暄教授协助创建强子力学Iso-数学基础的专著确实是中国数学界最杰出的数学著作！
附件
日期
内容
资料出处与备注
Attachment
Date
Description
Source & Remarks
1956
1936年蒋春暄出生于湖南〔毛泽东家乡的省〕。家里穷，初中没有毕业就去工厂当工人。他当时认为数理很简单没有兴趣，业余学习文学，想当一名业余作家。后来他一位朋友希望他们考大学，他朋友考文，他普通话讲不好，决定考工科。蒋春暄当时花了45天自学完了高中课程，结果考取了北京航空学院〔现在的北京航空航天大学〕。
自述
1956
In 1936 Jiang Chun-xuan was born in Hunan (the province of Mao Ze-dong’s home). As his family was poor, Jiang went to a factory to become a worker before graduating from junior middle school. He studied literature in his spare time, hoping to become a spare time writer. Later, one of his friends hoped that they could both enter the university. His friend aimed literature subjects. Jiang’s had a strong Hunan dialect causing him not to speak mandarin very well, so he decided to study in industrial subjects. Jiang spent only 45 days to self-study the senior middle school subjects before attending the university entry exams, and was accepted by the Beijing Aviation Institute (now the University of Aeronautic and Astronautic Science and Technology).
Self-described
1956-1961
蒋学习的专业是飞机工艺，后转为航空仪表制造，没有接触现代数学。蒋在北京航空学院时自学研究Si函数。蒋认为，如果他当时能够知道费马大定理，也可能在1960年他就证明了费马大定理。
自述
1956-1961
Jiang studied aircraft technics, and later switched to aviation instrumentation engineering. He started his studies on Si function in his spare time at the Beijing Aviation Institute. Jiang considers that if he then learnt about Fermat’s Last Theorem, he may have proved it in 1960.
Self-described
1961
1961年蒋春暄从北京航空学院毕业后，在中国航天部单位从事过许多技术领域的工作，业余时间继续从事数学领域的研究。
自觉
1961
After graduating from the Beijing Aviation Institute in 1961, Jiang work in many technical fields at units under the China Space Ministry, and continued his studies in mathematics during his spare time.
Self-described
P68A
1968.08
蒋春暄∶“用毛泽东思想创立一门新型数学”
摘要
本文主要是学习毛主席的“矛盾论”和“实践论”之后，来分析数的矛盾性和实践性。第一部分用一分为二的观点来研究数学，发现了数中的矛盾是正和负，从而发现了许多新的数学分支。并指出，正和负是一分为二在自然科学当中一种具体表现。第二分说明数学来源于实践，又反过来为实践服务。其提出了复杂的数就是微分方程式这一个新的观点。接着介绍了新的数学应用情况。另外对数域和数学没方法也提出一些看法。
注∶ 1968年，文革初期，蒋的一篇数学论文在当时清华大学的《井岗山》上发表。尽管保留有当时政治潮流的许多痕迹，该篇文章中保留着蒋后来证明菲马大定理的数学原始思路。
复印件
P68A
1968.08
Jiang: “Creation of a new type of mathematics with Mao Ze-dong’s thoughts”
Note: 1968, during the “Cultural Revolution”, this paper written by Jiang, was published on the “Jing Gang Shan” newspaper of Qinghua University in Beijing.Although imprinted with a lot of signs of the political streams at the time, this paper maintains the mathematical original thoughts of Jiang which he later further developed in his proof of Fermat’s last theorem (FLT).
Copy
1972
蒋春暄下放从东北回到北京，在朋友家金良超家知道有个Fermat最后定理，发现他在大学时期研究超复数中有费马方程式，决定研究Fermat最后定理。看了许多中、英、俄和德文有关资料，沿着过去前人研究的方向，走入死胡同。最后决定研究合数的费马大定理，才一下子证明它。
自述
1972
Jiang returned from educational labor work in Northeast of China, at a friend Jin Liang-chao’s home learnt that there was a Fermat’s Last Theorem, found that there was a Fermat formula in super-plurals he studied when he was in the university, and thus decided to study the Fermat Last Theorem. Jiang read a lot of related papers in Chinese, English, Russian and German, following the approach by earlier researchers entered into a dead-ended lane. Jiang later to study the Fermat’s Last Theorem of _______, and at once proved it.
Self-described
1973.03
蒋春暄写道∶“从1973年3月我们知道Fermat最后定理并企图想来证明就得到了许多同志们的帮助，特别是唐云同志。在研究过程中，多次同他进行讨论，并得到他的有益的指导”。
1978.05 “Fermat最后定理一般证明”最后的说明。
1973.03
Jiang Chun-wrote: “Since learning about FLT in March 1973 and intended to proof it, we received help from many comrades, especially comrade Tang Yun. During the studies, held discussions with him many times, and received beneficial guidance from him”.
Remarks at end of manuscript of “The General Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem”, May 1978
P75A-1
1975.04
蒋春暄∶“亚光速和超光速映射理论”
提要
本文首先从一般洛仑兹〔Lorentz〕变换引入空时环，反过来用它来研究慢子和快子运动学和动力学。为了建立慢子和快子统一理论，提出共存原理。在空时变换中讨论了三种情况∶(1)慢子之间空时变换，(2)快子之间空时变换，(3)慢子和快子之间空时变换。在中证明了所有快子无静质量，代替它的作用是伪静止动量，并指出高能加速器中横向动量是快子作用的结果。
《物理》，4，119-125〔1975〕
P75A-1
1975.04
Jiang Chun-xuan: “A Theory of Morphisms between the Tardyons and Tachyons” (Chinese)
Physics (Chinese), 4, 119-125 (1975) Received on Aug. 19, 1972
P76A
1976.04
蒋春暄∶“关于引力本质的探讨”
摘要
本文利用[1]的结果，讨论了亚光速和超光速共存原理∶、对它微分求出亚光速和超光速加速度∶，证明了亚光速粒子作曲线运动产生向心力加速度，它的惯性力是离心力；超光速粒子作曲线运动产生离心加速度、它的惯性是向心力、即引力，在一阶近似下，获得牛顿万有引力公式。最后指出黑洞不存在，在Schwarzschild半径内全是超光速粒子运动，这就是引力产生的根本原因。
北京天文台台刊，1976年4月p32-28
P76A
1976.04
Jiang Chun-xuan: “Exploring The Nature Of Gravitation”
Note: In 1999, Dr. John Maddox, former chief editor of Nature, wrote a paper “Unsolved Mysteries”. The paper pointed out various unsolved mystery problems of the past 20th century, which included issues related to the nature of gravitation. It was unfortunate that Dr. Maddox was not aware of the above paper written by Jiang 23 years ago.
Publication of Beijing Astronomy Observatory, p32-38, April 1976
Written by Jiang in Dec., 1972, revised in Nov. 1975.
Received by journal in Sep. 1975
P78A
1978.05.29
蒋春暄∶“Fermat最后定理一般证明”
蒋春暄在该文最后的说明写道∶“本文主要结果完成于1993年。本文根据“Fermat最后定理一般证明的讨论1975年5月修改补充”一文重新改写和补充。“
该论文复印件
P78A
1978.05.29
Jiang Chun-xuan: The General Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem
Abstract
The present paper it gives a new method about the general proof of Fermet’s last theorem, which is different to Kummer’s method.
In second section it introduces cyclic determent
(2.1)                  
where p is prime.
Lemma1. Eq (2.1) has an infinity of integer solutions,
In the remark at the end of this paper Jiang wrote: “The main result of this paper was completed inn 1993. This paper was rewritten with supplements in accordance to “Discussions On The General Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem, revisions and supplements, May 1995”.”
Copy of this paper
A79A
1979.05.07
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79A
1979.05.07
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
I have finally received the report of two referees who have studied your paper “A new possible mathematical model of hadrons” submitted for publication to the Hadronic Journal on April 16, 1979 (date of arrival).
It is with sincere regret that I must inform you that we are not able to publish your paper in its current form, because of the negative recommendations by the referees.
Nevertheless, I would like to encourage you to the continuation of your studies. I have reproduced the mostsalient parts of the referree’s reports in the enclosed page. As you can see, the referees have specific suggstions for the continuation of your studies. I would like to encourage you to consider them.
On my part, I will always remain at your disposal for the best assitance I can provide. For instance, if some revised version of your paper will meet with the approval of the referees, I will be glad to provide assistance for the linguistic finalization of the paper and retyping here in Cambridge at the expenses of our Journal.
Copy
A79B
1979.05.07
审稿者对蒋春暄英文“A new possible mathematical model of hadrons”〔“强子新的可能的数学模型”〕的审稿报告
复印件
A79B
1979.05.07
Summary of the referree reports on the paper by Dr. Jiang Chun-xuan entitled:
“A new possible mathematical model of hadrons”
submitted for publication to the HADRONIC JOURNAL
Copy
P79B
1979.06.15
蒋春暄∶On the symmetries and the stabilities of the 2 (21+1) electron configurations of the elements”
Physics Letters, 73A, 385-386 (1979) 复印件
P79B
1979.06.15
Jiang: On the symmetries and the stabilities of the 2 (21+1) electron configurations of the elements”
Abstract
The symmetries and stabilities of the subshells in the periodic table are proven mathematically and the next inert gases are predicted to be Z=118, 172, 226.
Physics Letters, 73A, 385-386 (1979)
Copy of the paper
Received 15 June 1979
P79A
1979.07.09
蒋春暄∶A simple approach to the computation of the total number of hadronic constituents in Santill’s model.〔英文〕
Hadronic Journal, 3, 256-292 (1979) 复印件
P79A
1979.07.09
Prof. Jiang: A simple approach to the computation of the total number of hadronic constituents in Santill’s model.
Note by Jiang: “This paper is an application of FLT. See p292.
Note by Chen: Reference listed on p292: “Jiang, Chun Xuan, Physics Letters 73A, 385 (1979), and “The general proof of Fermat’s theorem,” Mimeographed notes (in Chinese), Peking (1973-78).
Hadronic Journal, 3, 256-292 (1979)
Received July 9, 1979
Revised version received Aug. 1, 1979, Final Version received Dec. 19, 1979. Copy of the paper
A79C
1979.07.05
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79C
1979.07.05
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
As promised, I have tried to help you to my best with your paper, but with the following understandings:
(1)    my assistance is strictly confidential;
(2)    upon completion of this paper, I have to submit it to referees for approval or rejection;
(3)    it is your paper, and, thus, my assistance is merely of suggstion-type, that is, you should decide whether you accept or reject my suggestions.
I enclose the draftings of Sections 1 and 3 with my recommendations. Section 2 on the mathematical part is absent. I strongly suggest that you complete this very important part of your paper with the assistance of a qualified mathematician in Peking, expert in number theory.
The mathematical maturity of this section will be a crucial element for approval or rejection of your paper. If this section 2 is perfect, the possibilities for approval of your paper are greatly increased.
On the contrary, if section 2 on the mathematical theorems is questionable, quite frankly, I see little possiblities for approval.
Copy
A79E
1979.08.31
〔日内瓦〕《化学物理通讯》编辑L Jansen先生致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79E
1979.08.31
Mr. L Jansen, Editor, Chemical Physics Letters, Geneva, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
Thank you for sending us your manuscrips entitled:
“On the Symmetry and the Stability of the Huckel (4n+2) Rule” and
“On the (or) Free Radical”,
which you submitted for publication in Chemical Physics Letters.
The manuscripts were reviewed by on of our referees. It took a rather long time before reaching certain conclusions. The referee showed your work to three of this colleagues as well.
Please find enclosed the referee’s report. As you will read, there may well be a considerable amount of work and discussion with the referee necessary until you work can be published. Both he and I myself do wish, however, that you will engage in such discussions. We hope to hear from you soon again.”
Copy
1979.09.18
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信
A79H中提到
1979.09.18
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang
Mentioned in A79H
A79F
1979.10.19
〔日内瓦〕《化学物理通讯》编辑L Jansen先生致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79F
1979.10.19
Mr. L Jansen, Editor, Chemical Physics Letters, Geneva, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
Your manuscript entitled “On the Stabilities of pi-Electron Systems”, submitted for publication in Chemical Physics letters, has been reviewed by your original referee (and some of his colleagues). Please find enclosed his report.
I am herewith returning the manuscrip for your consideration fo the referee’s reply. We will keep the copies we made on our files. If you wish to continue the discussion with your referee(s), then please send only a letter.
Copy
A79G
1979.11.14
〔美国〕《社会与生物结构》主编James F. Danielli致信蒋春暄的邀稿函。
复印件
A79G
1979.11.14
Mr. James F. Danielli, Chief Editor, Journal of Social and Biological Structures, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
The purpose of this letter is to invite you to contribute to the Journal of Scial and Biological Structures. The Journal has been in existence for some time.
Our basic goal is to provide the stimulus and forum for the publication of research about structures and processes in biological and social organizations. We hope to play a contributory role in fostering the emergence of hypotheses and theorecticla propositions about the dynamical properties of deep seated consitutional structures.
While this hope helps establish general guidelines it does not define contect; we expect most articles to deal with specific problems or findings. Some topics that seem relevant include: structures in relation to all aspects of human behaviour, e.g., lingustics, soclial structure, structure of the psyche; sombol formation; structure of religions and other belief systems; structural approaches in domains such as music, peotry, literature; agression, cooperation, hierarchy, conflict resolution; policy formation, decision theory priority and planning theory, stability, decay, coordination.
Wehave got this journal off to a good start and we would greatly appreciate your help in the next stage of development.
Copy
A79H
1979.10.23
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79H
1979.10.23
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun-Xuan,
Thank you for your letter of October 13 arrived this morning. I appreciated your approval of the editorial modifications of your paper.
As promised in my letter to you of September 18, 1979, I have submitted your paper for independent refereeing. A copy of the referee report is enclosed for your consideration.
….. I am attempting to have your paper published in the December issue of the HADRONIC JOURNAL. But, again, I can do it if and only if I receive a favourable approval and comments of our editorial review process. This December issue will be entirely devoted to the Proceedings of the SECOND WORKSHOP ON LIE-ADMISSIBLE FORMULATIONS, we held here from August 1 – 7, 1979. Durng this workshop we discussed considerably your paper, and several participants expressed interest in it. Therefore, I believe that your paper would qualify as a contributing paper to the workshop.
….. In conslusion, the report of the referee has been critical, but constructively critical. Please do not be discouraged, because this is a standard practice here. We review and criticize each other papers to achieve the best possible maturity of presentation and content. As a matter of fact you should be proud and happy of your efforts. Indeed, the referee was quite intrigued and interested. This occurs only when the paper has scientific value.
…I enclose copy of the Report of September 28, 1979 of Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in Standford, California, 94305 with the listing of your paper.
In relation to your paper “Coexistence theory …” I believe that it is better you send a copy to Stanford directly from Peking, because this paper is not under consideration in the Hadronic Journal.
Copy
A79H-1
1979.10.23
对蒋春暄英文“A Simple Approach to the Computation of the Total Number of Hadronic Constituents in Santilli’s Model”的审稿意见
A79H-1
1979.10.23
Referee Report on “A Simple Approach to the Computation of the Total Number of Hadronic Constituents in Santilli’s Model” By Jiang Chun-xuan
A79D
1979.10.30
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A79D
1979.10.30
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Collegue,
I would appreciate the courtesy of sending me a copy of your paper entitled
“A simple approach to the computation of the total number of Hadronic consituents in Santilli’s model”
Copy
A80A
1980.01.09
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A80A
1980.01.09
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang,
You will be pleased to know that the Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Lie-admissible Formulations are in print. Your article is part of the second volume of the proceedings, that of research. I enclose the table of contents, so that you can have an earliery reference of your article.
After due consideration, we decided to print your article in the form exactly as you approved it, plus a postcript indicating the references and the points raised by the referee. Indeed, we though that this was the best way to preserve th espirit of your paper as you desire it.
I will be happy to assist you in a period of study, so that you can bring your research capabilities to a maximum. To this effect, I have separately air mailed to you a complimentary copy of my monograph “Foundations of Theorectical Mechanics”, I, with
spminger-Verlag, and of “Lie-admissible approach to the hadronic structure”, I with the Hadronic Press. These general presentations should expose you to what I believe is the foundation of physics: the most general possible forces, and the anlytic methods for their treatment.
I would recommend you that you study these works and, in case you have any technical difficulty, please let me know, and I shall try my best. For your information, all available books in mechanics treat the case of the forces f = V/r. The first comrehensive treatments of more general forces are presented in these works.
After this physical background, I believe that you will be ready for more sphysticated theorectical treatments. I would like to recommend you, as next step, the study of the Proceedings of the Second Workshop. You will receive a complimentary copy of the two volumes as soon as available (within a few weeks), by air mail. The understanding of some parts of the proceedings will call for your previous study of nonassociative algebras. Please feel free to consdult with me in regards to the best way to use your time. I can recommend selected readings or you and assist you in finding them.
After that, I would be happy to mail you my volume II of “Foundations of …” and of “Lie-admissible approach …”. These two volumes will bring you mor edirectly into the confronation of the fundamental problems of contemporary physics which, in my view, are open at this moment, and thus open to nonincremental advances. In this way you can have a progressive exposure to the structure of hadrons.
I have great faith in you, in your intutition, and in your possibilities. However, my sincere advice to you is to delay the writing of additional papers, until you have acquired more technical and mathematical knowledge. In different words, I recommend that you keep accumulating your ideas, and then present htem after you are achieved more mathematicla and physical knowledge. I am happy to help you in this respect to my best.
Copy
A80B
1980.01.21
伦敦学院大学化学系D. Mathur博士致蒋春暄的信
复印件
A80B
1980.01.21
Dr. D. Mathur, Dept. of Chemistry, University College London, to Jiang:
Thank you for sending me your prelinminary draft of the paper “A simple approach to the computation of the total number of Hadronic constituents in Santilli’s Model”. Though outside my field of activity, I found your paper of interest.
I would like to take this opportunity of expressing satisfaction at the way Science has been given such a big boost in Socialist China recently. I look forward to Chinese scientists playing a full role in the international scientific community.
My work is concerned with experiemntal atmoic collisions physics, and I enclose some recent reprints of my papers which may be of interest ot your atomic collisions colleagues.
Copy
A80C
1980.02.05
〔德国〕《Gesamthochschule Kassel》B. Fricke博士给蒋春暄的信。
A80C
1980.02.05
Dr. B. Fricke, Gesamthochschule Kassel, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang,
It was a great pleasure for me to receive your letter of January 25th. It is astonishing for me to find someone who is interested in these questions so far away. I’ma little bit puzzled about the results which you are getting, because I still get at least a noble gas character with our Hartree-Fock calculations for the lements 118 and 172. Element 226 is very questionable indeed. I must very much contradict to your opinion that the 5g shell does not exist. If you look to the excitation spectra of very heavy elements, you easily can see that electrons in the 5g and 6g shell are invloved. Where did you get this result from? I also do not understand, why a p shell should not be stable. Even if none of us is correct. I’m sure that at least for every very heavy system where a nucleus exists, nature produces a stable ground state electronic configuration. This is a very general physical statement, and this shows me that the non-existence of superheavy elements is not connected with any stability of the electron cloud. The non-existance is directly related to the stability of the nucleus and nothing else. This my opinion to this question, and it would be nice to see more details of your consideration.
A80D
1980.02.09
〔美国〕哈佛大学R. M. 桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
A80D
1980.02.09
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Harvard University, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang,
Thank you for your letter of January 25, 1980. The two volumes of the Proceedings of the workshop (Volume 2, number 6 and Volume 3, number 1 of the Hadronic Journal) have been air mailed to you, as promised. Your article is in the second volume.
A80E
1980.04.08
Pualo Ribenboim教授致蒋春暄的信∶
蒋春暄的注∶
Paulo Ribenboim 的书“13 Lectures on Fermat’s Last Theorem”〔关于费马大定理的13次演讲“是当代最要FLT的书。
复印件
A80E
1980.04.08
Prof. Pualo Ribenboim letter to Jiang:
Dear Mr. Jiang:
My secretary has forwarded me your letter – just a the photocopy of the first page of your text. I plan to be back in Canada in June and after looking at your text I’ll comment.
Yours sincerely
Paulo Ribernboim
P.S. You may be interested in knowing that my book “13 Lectures on Fermat’s Last Theorem” has now appreared, published by Sprinter Verlag of New York.
Note by Jiang:
Paulo Ribenboim’s book “13 Lectures on Fermat’s Last Theorem” is the most important book on FLT.
Copy
A80F
1980.06.09
〔美国〕德克萨斯大学粒子理论中心物理系Arno Bohm致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A80F
1980.06.09
Prof. Arno Bohm, Dept. of Physics, Center for Particle Theory (CPT), The University of Texas At Austin, letter to Jiang:
Dear Mr. Jiang,
Thank you very much for your letter of May 23, 1980.
Before we can see wither there will be any possibility for you to work in our university we would have to know more about your background and your wishes. Are you interested in obtaining a Ph.D. from Texas University? Do you need financial support? Please send us a vita and a list of publications.
Copy
A80G
1980.06.30
〔美国〕强子杂志总编桑蒂利给蒋春暄的信∶
A80G
1980.06.30
R. M. Santilli, Editor in Chief, Hardonic Journal, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun Xuan,
It is pleasure to inform you that your paper with Professor Pei-zhuang is in print in the June issue of the Hadronic Journal.
A complimentary copy of the issue with your article will be air-mailed to you as soon as possible.
Copy
1978.07.19
1978年，在科学院前院长方毅的关心下，科学院数学所曾于1978.07.19下午组织过蒋春暄费马大定理证明的研讨会，蒋春暄的证明被否定。他的单位后来接到通知要蒋不要作无谓的探索，多作一些现实的对社会有益的事。
自述
1978.07.19
According to instructions from Fang Yi, President of China Academy of Science, the Mathematics Research Institute of China Academy of Science held a meeting afternoon July 19, 1978 which disproved Jiang’s (1978) proof of Fermet’s Last Theorem. A note was later sent to Jiang’s unit suggesting that Jiang Chun-xuan should not waste effort on meaningless exploration, and should do work beneficial to the society.
Described by Prof. Jiang
1980.01.09
萨蒂利教授致蒋春暄的字条∶
尊敬的蒋春暄博士，诚挚地祝愿光明的前程。
复印件
1980.01.09
Note from Santilli to Jiang:
Dr. Jiang, Chun-xuan
With sincere best wishes for a brilliant future.
R. M. Sattili
Copy
P80B
1980.06.26
蒋春暄，汪培庄∶The graphical procedure for the symmetrical analysis of stable group〔英文〕
Hadronic Journal, June (1980)m 1320, Copy of the paper
P80B
1980.06.26
Jiang Chun-xuan, Wang Pei-zhuang:
The graphical procedure for the symmetrical analysis of stable group
Abstract
We prove a theorem that leads to a decomposition of a finite setunder the action of the group of cyclic transformations. We consider a number of specific examples.
Hadronic Journal, June (1980)m 1320, Received June 26, 1980.
Copy of the paper
A82A
〔美国〕《强子杂志》编辑部和编辑委员会名单
复印件
A82A
List of Editorial Board and Editorial Council of Hadronic Journal
Copy
A80H
1980.07.07
〔德国〕Theoretische Physik, Gesamthochschule Kassel的B. Frieck教授致函蒋春暄∶
复印件
A80H
1980.07.07
Prof. B. Frieck, Theoretische Physik, Gesamthochschule Kassel, Germany, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang,
Thank you very much for your last letter of May 5th, 1980. From this letter I can imagine how hard it is for you to work in your country and do research. …
Nevertheless, I’m still very interested to see your newest results, although I still do not see what a prime number has to do with the electrons souround atom. If I may remind you it is well-known that 5g electrons exist in many, many atoms in excited states, so that I don’t see any reason why they could not exist in the groundstate of a very heavy atom.
Thank you very much again for your last letter.
Copy
A80I
1980.07.10
〔美国〕密歇根大学物理系Thomas Witten副教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A80I
1980.07.10
Asst. Prof. Thomas Witten, Dept. of Physics, The University of Michigan, letter to Jiang:
Dear Mr. Jiang:
Thank you for your letter outlining your physics interests and inquiring about opportunities in our department to pursue these interests. It is clear from you letter that you deeply interested in unifying symmetry principles in nature, this is an interest that many of us share. …
You may wish to write to Prof. George Estabrook of the Botany department regarding symmetry principles governing the structure of physics.
Note by Jiang:
George F. Estabrook is an editor for Mathematical Bioscience.
Copy
A80J
1980.09.15
〔美国〕强子杂志总编桑蒂利给蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A80J
1980.09.15
R. M. Santilli, Editor in Chief, Hardonic Journal, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun Xuan,
On August 4 to 9 we had a quite intriguing Third Workshop in Lie-admissible Formulations here in the Boston area. We had some 15 pure mathematicians, an equal number of theoreticians and experimentalists.
The Proceedings witll be published in January 1981 (see enclosed material). I would like to invite you to publish a paper in these proceedings, as we did it for the Proceedings of the Second Workshop. I would be happy to assist you to my best for typing and linguistic editing of your paper.
Perhaps, you may contact: Professor Sun Ji, Department of Technical Physics, Peking University, Peking
In fact, we recently accepted papers by Professor Sun Ji in the Hardonic Journal which deal with the problem of the hadronic structure. His ideas are quite similar to our own, although they are different.
I am confident that an exchange of ideas between you and Prof. Sun Ji would be valuable for both.
P.S. We published your recent article in the June issue and a complimentary copy of the issue was mailed to you.
Copy
A80K
1980.10.13
拉丁美洲生物数学学会秘书长Alba N. Zaretzky致函蒋春暄∶
复印件
A80K
1980.10.13
Alba N. Zaretzky, Secretaria, Sociedad Latinamericana de Biomatematica, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang Chun-xuan:
In connection with the realization of the First Congress and Second Latin American Course of Biomathematics planned to take place at Concepcion, Chile, in November-December 1980, we regret to inform you that the concretiono fthese events will not be possible at the place and date previously fixed. …
The Latic American Society of Biomathematics hopes to organize both events next year, and four Latin American Universityies have already offered their places in connection with this. Because of this we will keep you constantly informed.
Besides, we would like to have your previous papers, because they seem to be very interesting. It would be very nice if you could send us reprints of them.
Copy
A80L
1980.10.22
〔美国〕强子杂志总编桑蒂利关于蒋春暄的推荐信∶
复印件
A80L
1980.10.22
R. M. Santilli, Editor in Chief, Hardonic Journal, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun Xuan,
It is pleasure to recommend you Prossefor JIANG, CHUN-XUAN from the People’s Republic of China.
I had the opportunity of following for some time the research by Professor Jiang, Chun-xuan as editor of the Hadronic Journal. The submission of an initial article in 1979 was found by the referee of insufficient English style, but of excellent content. We therefore assisted Professor Jiang, Chun-Xuan in the editorial-linguistic control, and the paper was printed in Volume 3 of our Journal. Since that time, he has improved his English considerably and he has become a regular contributor to our Journal. One of the articles appreared in the Proceedings of the Second Workshop in Lie-admissible Formulations. This may give you an idea of the advanced nature of Professor Jiang, Chun-Xun intests and knowledge.
The several editorial exchanges also gave me the opportunity to correspond on personel grounds. I am under the impression that Professor Jiang, Chun-Xuan is a very nice person, with a high sense of scientific ethics (which is an unfortunate rarity in our western circles of research), as well as of respect of his fellow colleagues.
For these reasons I would like to recommend him to you most highly.
Copy
A81M
1981.01.30
〔美国〕强子杂志总编、桑蒂利关于蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81M
1981.01.30
R. M. Santilli, Editor in Chief, Hardonic Journal, Professor of Physics at the Univerity of Massachusetts in Boston, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Chun Xuan,
I am regrettably forced to return enclosed your manuscript entitled “The lifetime of unstable …”. This is due to the fact that the Hadronic Journal is complete for the next several issues, and the first openings are for the end of the year.
Perhaps, you can joint the content of this with that of the following one, and submit to another Journal without restriction on length (such as Il Nuovo Cimento).
If, by the end of this year your article is still unpublished, please let me know, and I shall do my best. In the meantime I shall keep this letter on file to keep a priority opening for you.
Copy
P81A
1981
蒋春暄∶“多体稳定性的一种新理论”
Abstract
A new theory about the many-body stabilities.
〔中国〕《潜科学》1〔1981〕38-43
复印件
P81A
1981
Prof. Jiang: A New Theory About The Many-Body Stabilities (Chinese)
Abstract
A new theory about the many-body stabilities.
(China) “Potential Science” 1 (1981 38-43
Copy of the paper.
A81A
1981.03.29
〔美国〕强子杂志总编桑蒂利给蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81A
1981.03.29
R. M. Santilli, Editor in Chief, Hardonic Journal, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang, Chun-Xuan,
I would like to express my sincere regret for our inability to publish until now your paper entitled “On algebraic group of stable group and unstable group theories”. …
Please have a bit more patience, and your article will be finally published in an editred and rytyped form, as promised.
In regard to the other articles your submitted, please consider my suggestion of either submitting them in another Journal (Nuovo Cimento or Annals of Physics), or you should pause for a while in writing articles, mediate them, coordinate them, and eventually prepare a broader versions by the end of the year.
Copy
A81B
1981.05.05
〔美国〕基础研究所托管和会主席、理论物理桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81B
1981.05.05
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Professor of Theoretical Physics, and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, The Institute For Basic Research, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang, Chun-Xuan,
Thank you for your letters regarding your availability to participate to our FOURTH WORKSHOP ON LIE-ADMISSIBLE FORMULATIONS. …
I would like to take this opportunity of informating you of the forthecoming FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NONPOTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND THEIR LIE-ADMISSIBLE TREATMENT. Professors Fronteau and Tellez-Arenas have mailed to me copy of your letter. …
I would like to to recommend you the following participation to the Conference. We shall prepare a booklet for distribution to the participants at the opening ceremony.y. This booklet will contain a number of information on the conference, plus the summaries of the research by all authors in the filed (2-pages maximum). You should prepare you summary of 2-typed pages maximum and mail it to the organization headquarters in Orleans, France. This should give you an excellent opportunity to promote your studies and let them know. As far as the topic of the summary is concerned, I recommend to prepare a review of your paper in the Proceedings of the Second Workshop, plus an indication of your more recent results, as well as all available reference,s, so that interested readers can study the orignal papers.
Copy
A81C
1981.05.22
〔美国〕基础研究所托管和会主席、理论物理桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81C
1981.05.22
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Professor of Theoretical Physics, and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, The Institute For Basic Research, letter to Jiang:
Dear Professor Jiang Chun-xuan,
It is with sincere regret we inform you that it will be impossible for us to provide even a small financial support for your participation to the 4th Workshop on Lie-admisible Formulations.
Copy
A81D
1981.07.15
Prof. Hans J. Bremermann, Prof. Of Mathematics and Biophysics, University of California, Berkely, Editor, Journal of Mathematical Biology, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang:
Find enclosed your paper “The Application of ‘Stable Groups to Biological Structures” which you submitted for publication to the Journal of Mathematical Biology, together with a “postscript” which I receved on May 28.
I have consulted one of the foremost experts on biological structue and received the following reply:
“I can’t make heads or tails out of this paper. It appears to be a formal development of group-theorectic ideas and its connection to biology is preposterous, as far as I can tell. I can’t comment on its mathematical merits, but I can say that it has zero biological content and definetly should not be considered for publication in JMB.”
A second referee has the following to say:
“Fascination with prime numbers goes back more than 2000 years and Pythagorean philosophers have speculated about connections between prime numbers and the harmony of the universe. The problem is how to transcend mere speculation and how to establish solid theories that measure up to customeary standards of science. Here Dr. Jiang’s mauscript falls woefully short. It is pure speculation and devoid of any stematic development of the ideas presented.”
In veiw of these reports the Journal of Mathematical Biology is unable to publish your manuscript. Perhaps it may be possible to revise the manuscript, concentrating on the mathematical ideas and to publish these in a different journal.
I have also received your letter of May 30 concerning establishment of a new journal: “The prime principle and its application”, with Springer Vrlag as publisher. If you wish to persue this idea you should contact Sprinter Verlag directly. It is located in Heidelberg, West Germany.
A81E
1981. 08
Fourth Workshop on Lie Admissible Formulations〔会议通知〕
复印件
A81E
1981. 08
Fourth Workshop on Lie Admissible Formulations (A poster)
Copy
A81F
1981.09.21
〔美国〕基础研究所桑蒂利教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81F
1981.09.21
Prof. R. M. Santilli, The Institute For Basic Research, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang, Chun-Xuan,
You will be pleased to know that your paper entitled
“A United theory of the particle decay mode in Santilli’s model” has been accepted for publication in the PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NONPOTENTIAL INTERACTIONS. Your name will be printed with an asterisk indicating “corresponding participant”. We have studied your paper and found it quite nice and well written. The paper will therefore be printed in the version you mailed me. The only possibility of modification rests on the title because it bears my name, and the Editorial Committee of the Conference might decide to change the title (only). If this decision will be made, I shall let you know.
I would like to recommend that you also prepare a two pages abstract/review of this paper as well as of the first you published in the HJ, for publication in the book of abstracts which will be delivered at the inauguration ceremony of the Conference at Orleans. …
Your other paper is in press in the HJ, in either the issue of October or that of December. In this way I keep my promise with you that the paper will be published this year (despite a considerable publication load of papers for the Journal).
Copy
A81G
198111.23
〔美国〕密歇根大学研究科学家George F. Estabrook副教授致蒋春暄的信∶
复印件
A81G
198111.23
Ass. Prof. George F. Estabrook, Research Scientist, Associate Professor of Botany, University of Michigan Herbarium, letter to Jiang:
Dear Chun-Xuan:
Thank you for your letter of 30 May 81. I have read with considerable interest your past letters to me, your resume, and in fact, your manuscript “The Application of Stabel Group to Biologcal Structures”. You may not know that I was a student of Stanislaw Ulam in Combinatorial Mathematics. I not only read your manuscript myself, but I sent it to two other professors of mathematics specializing in algebra and combinatorics. We all had difficulty to understand it. I think much of the difficulty comes from the difference in the philosophical perspectives of our different cultures. I would like to understand your point of view better.
I think we could helop each other understand nature better. There are various approaches we could take. I would be pleased to be a member of the editorial council of the new journal on “prime principle”, which you propose founding, but I would like to understand better what your “prime principle” is. ...
Copy
A81H
1981.12.11
第十三届国际癌症会议组织者Judith S. Felski给蒋春暄的信∶
以及蒋春暄提交该会议题目为“癌症的来源”的文摘。
复印件
A81H
1981.12.11
Judith S. Felski, 13th International Cencer Congress, letter to Jiang:
Dear Dr. Jiang:
Your abstract for consideration for presentation at the 13th International Cencer Congress has been received via our Seattle office in the office of the Program Chairman. We are returning the abstract to you along with the appropriate form for submission. Please not that it needs to be typed within the box on the form. Even though the deadline of December 1 has passed, if you can return the completed abstract immediately, it will be considered for the Congress.
Note: Jiang filled out the form with abstract as follows:
On The Origin of Cancers
Abstract
One year ago I suggested that two principles in DNA and RNA, theprime number principle and the symmetrical principle, that every 4n+2=2p, where p is an odd prime number, can be interpreted as stable, but every 4n (n>1) system as unstable. These forms of cancers and commonly assumed to raise as the result of local changes in DNA and RNA sequences. The creation of cancer cell can be caused by change of promoter seqeunces. 4n base-pair sequence of promoter is abloe to produce the transformation cells. 8n base-pair sequencs of promoter is able to produce cancer cells. Recently Novak and Griffin also pointed out minimum viral sequence fo rhte induction of transformation, for example TTAAAATA, that is 8-bp. We believe that many unstable sequences induced cancers will be found in future biological experiements, for 8-bp, 16-bp, 24-bp, 32-bp …. It will provide cluses about the origin of cancer.
Copy
A82B
文摘表 – 第十二届国际生物化学会议
蒋春暄的提交的文摘
复印件
A82B
Abstract Form – 12th International Congress of Biochemistry
The Mathematical Models For DNA and RNA Segments
Abstract
Two years ago I suggested that two principles: 1. The prime number principle. A prime number is erreducible in the integers. It seems therefore natural to associate it with the most stable biological segment for example DNA and RNA segments. 2. Thesymmetrical prinicple. Themost stable configuration of two prime numbers is then stable and symmetrical base-pair segment in DNA and RNA. Recently it found 3-bp, 5-bp, 7-bp, 11-bp, 23-bp, 47-bp segments in biological experiemnts. We believe that 59-bp, 83-bp, 107-bp, 167-bp, 179-bp, 227-bp, 263-bp … are found in future biological experiements. Above two principels associated with the biological experiments will be further understood mmolecular structure of genes and evolution process and be discovered some news. 4n (n>1) base-pair segment of promoter is able to produce the transforming cells, 8n base-pair sequence of promoter is able to produce cancer cells, for example, 8-bp, 16-bp, 32-bp …. It will provide clue about the origin of cancers. The evolutiono the living organisms starts with mutant of the prime number system to another new one which may be produced a new species to raise up seed and its structure tended to stabilize in givern enivirement.
* Corresponding participartn, because Aughor is an amateur in CHINA and no travel funds.
Copy
A82C
1982.01
《潜科学》编者按∶本刊1980年第2期与1981年第1期分别发表的张颖清的《生物全息律》、蒋春暄的《多体稳定性的一种新理论》两文，引起了国内外学者的注意。因为这两篇效率都发表于本刊的试刊期间，读者面较窄。为满足读者的要求，现摘要再发表，同时附发读者的评议意见。
对《多体稳定性的一种新理论》的评议
英国Mathar化学博士认为，从这篇文章可以看社会主义中国最近在科学上的大步前进，我们表示敬意。在今后，中国科学家在国际科学的活动中应起重要的作用。
西德Kassal大学物理系B. Fricke博士来信说，对惰性气体偶然性这样复杂的问题，这样简单地解决真使人感到惊讶。
在美国的客座教授Schober在法国的第一届非位相互作用和不允许处理国际会议上指出，本文作者所提出的这种空间，是非欧几何和非笛卡尔几何，它适合于强子内部结构，而强子量子色动力学模型假设内部和外部都属于同一几何。
本文发表后，作者收到一些国外学术团体会议的邀请。例如∶瑞士寄来邀请信，安排作者在第IX届国际生物发育学家会议期间〔1981年8月31日〕宣读论文；第12届国际生物化学会议和在阿根廷召开的拉美生物数学会议也发出类似的邀请。
1982年2月8日，拉美生物数学协会秘书长A. H. Zaretzky教授邀请蒋春暄博士作为该学会正式会员〔我国生物数学协会正在筹备中〕。
《潜科学》杂志1982年1, p38-40
A82C
1982.01
“Potential Science” republished summary of Jiang’s paper “A New Theory on Stability of Multi-bodies” and reactions from abroad.
China “Potential Science” 1982, 1, p38-40
P82C
1982.08.16
蒋春暄∶Unified theory of particle decay model in eletonic model
〔美国〕《强子理论》5 (1982), 1517-1528〔复印件〕
P82C
1982.08.16
Jiang: Unified theory of particle decay model in eletonic model
Abstract
In a previous paper we have given a reasonable description of the total number of constituents (eletons and anti-eletons) in Santilli’s structure model of hadrons. In this paper we shall extend these results to include decays of unstable hadrons. We shall continue to use the theory of stable and unstable groups with particular reference to Euler’s function.
Hadronic J., 5 (1982), 1517-1528
Copy of the paper
P82A
1982.02
蒋春暄∶“神经系统结构中两个基本原理”
〔中国〕《潜科学》2〔1982〕 44
复印件
P82A
1982.02
Jiang: Two basic principles in nerve system structure (Chinese)
(China) “Potential Science”, 2 (1982) 44 (Copy of the paper)
P82B
1982.04
蒋春暄∶“关于引力本质的探讨”
摘要
本文利用文献[1]的结果，证明引力是快子的惯性力作用的结果。
〔中国〕《潜科学》4〔1982〕19-20
复印件
P82B
1982.04
Jiang: Exploring the nature of gravitation
China “Potential Science” 4〔1982〕19-20 Copy
P82C
Jiang:  A umified theory of particle decay modes in eletonic model