蒋春暄划时代论文在国外反映

蒋春暄划时代论文在国外反映

转载

蒋春暄

划时代

论文

国外反映

教育

这是蒋春暄划时代论文在国外反映

From: Laurent Schadeck<laurentschadeck@gmail.com>
Subject:Re: Re: 转发
Dear Chun-Xuan,

Perhaps the best should be to UNITE your paper "Jiang's function in prime distribution" and "Santilli's isoprime theory" into a single, self-contained and monumental monograph.

That would be a continuation of your book, I suggest. Hence we could forward a copy to Prof: Huxley for further criticisms.

your friend
LS

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, <jiangchunxuan@vip.sohu.com> wrote:
Dear Profs Santilli and Weiss
I get email for England great mathmeatician  Huxley of the prime distribution,who understand my paper,but do not understand my paper.He say my paper like a book which only has the first page and last page .Formulas (6),(7) and (8) are jewels of mathematics. Using it I prove all the theorem in prime distribution.I add o-notation of Landau.
Best Yours.
Chun-Xuan Jiang

这是英国著名数论专家Huxley第二次给蒋春暄来信,笫一次来信在国内很多网站传载攻击蒋春暄.

From: Martin Huxley<Huxley@cardiff.ac.uk>
Subject:Re: 转发
Dear Professor Jiang,
Thank you for sending the October 2008 version of your paper
`Jiang's function $J_{n+1}(\omega }$ in prime distribution. I have two
serious criticisms.

The first is that your function $J$ is infinite as it stands; however its
ratio to the appropriate power of the $\phi $ function can be defined as a
limit under suitable circumstances, which are evidently those in which you
use it in the examples.

The second is that your argument only gives the main term in the sieve,
and you write formulae with a $~$ sign, which I assume should mean
asymptotic equality., but might only mean `of the same order of
magnitude'. Even in the latter meaning, this is the great difficulty and
aim towards which sieve methods are directed. So your arguments in the
preprints which you have sent to me are very incomplete, like a book which
only has the first page and the last page. A complete lower bound sieve
argument permits one to calculate a number $N$ such that there is at least
one prime number $P$ satisfying the conditions with $ P \leq N$.

With best wishes, Martin Huxley.