日媒评论:中日钓鱼岛紧张升级

来源:百度文库 编辑:神马文学网 时间:2024/06/13 01:15:08

 

这是日本时代网站9月23日的文章:


问与答:中日钓鱼岛紧张升级

---关于撞船地点的来龙去脉

 钓鱼岛撞船事件愈演愈烈,两国都在这个事件上互相指责,从外交争吵到公众抗议,期间又逢日本高层换届,日本著名演艺团体SMAP也取消了原定的上海音乐会。这个事件的核心:钓鱼岛,是位于中国东海的有争议的岛屿,并处于日本的实际控制之下,日本称之为尖阁列岛,但是,北京和台湾政府也都声明对该岛拥有主权,他们称其为钓鱼岛或者钓鱼台,下面以问答的形式来介绍情况: 为什么中国船长被拘捕? 一艘日本海岸警卫队(Japan Coast Guard)的巡逻船与中国的渔船在9月7日早晨,在日本声明的领海发生碰撞,起先日本船只警告中国渔船离开相关水域,然后日本巡逻船Yonakuni号被撞,到目前为止还没有详细资料报告发布关于是谁或是什么原因造成了这起撞船事件。日本巡逻船要求其停船检查,而中方船长拒绝了日本方面的要求,在早晨的稍后时间另一艘日本巡逻船Mizuki号在追捕过程中在Kuba岛附近与中国渔船发生了另一次碰撞。中国41岁船长詹其雄第二天被指控妨碍公务逮捕,并被指控非法捕鱼。  中国在此撞船事件上的立场是什么?1992年中国制定了领海法,其中包括了钓鱼岛等作为其领海的一部分,所以日本在这片海域行使法律对于北京来说是无法接受的,一开始北京当局强烈要求释放船长,并称其为非法的和无效的。
本星期稍早,中国外交部发言人马朝旭在外交部官方网站声明说,日本应该立即无条件放人,如果日本坚持自己的法律程序,中国将采取进一步强烈措施,一切后果由日本承担。 渔船船长的情况怎么样?  石垣海上保安部8日逮捕船长,那霸地方检察厅石垣支部10日申请拘留后,石垣简易法院当天批准拘留,石垣简易法院19日批准将中国渔船船长詹其雄的拘留期限延长10天至29日。北京立即反应,中断与日本部长级高层交流。 钓鱼岛在哪里? 该无人岛群位于中国东海,岛屿面积仅7平方公里,包括日本所称的Uotsuri, Kuba, Minami Kojima和其他一些岛礁,距离台湾和石垣岛170公里,在台湾和冲绳管辖区中间。
该岛群由日本政府控制,称其为尖阁群岛,中国和台湾在1970年后都声明拥有其主权,他们称呼为钓鱼岛或者钓鱼台,这里经常是外交风暴的发源地。 日本政府的观点是什么? 在1885年的中日战争期间,日本通过调查该岛是无人岛并且“表明没有被大清帝国控制的迹象”,日本外交大臣在外交部网站上如是说。在1895年日本政府官方地图中将其作为日本领土的一部分,而该群岛成为日本南方群岛,并有少数日本人生活在该群岛,将其作为鱼类加工场所,在1940年后尖阁群岛再次被荒废。
战后,尖阁群岛,包括冲绳(琉球)等岛屿,作为美军的战利品控制在圣弗朗西斯科和平条约之下,冲绳等岛屿在1971年归还日本,可是该协议仅仅是归还尖阁列岛控制权,而没有明确主权归属,中国和台湾为此而提出反对。
“在中国东海没有领土争议”,新日本外相前原诚司说,尖阁列岛是日本领土的一部分。 什么时候和为什么中国与台湾声明对该群岛拥有主权? 自从1895年中日第一次战争,中方失败签署了“不平等条约”将尖阁列岛移交给日本后,在这之后的75年当中这两个政府对该群岛的态度都不明确。
在1968年联合国经济发展管理局委托调查的亚洲和远东报告显示在尖阁列岛海域含有潜在的油田,中国和台湾政府在1971年公开宣布拥有这一群岛领域的主权。 还有类似的情况发生在日本的领海上吗? 是的,日本海岸警卫队司令官Hisayasu Suzuki 最近一次议会委员会会议上说仅仅是今年就检查发现有21宗外国船只非法进入日本领海事件。
相似的情况发生在2004年,7名中国抗议者由于非法登上尖阁列岛群而被逮捕,当时由日本首相小泉纯一郎领导的日本政府决定将这些抗议者驱逐回中国。
中国可能期盼着这次渔船船长会得到相似的待遇(还真是差不多的待遇,24日你就知道了,嘻嘻,by mtjs),最后不了了之,但是,这次,处理这次事件的是检察官,而不是政客。 日本的安全盟友美国对这次事件有什么反应?8月,美国政府发言人菲利浦.克罗里在新闻发布会上就美日安保范围包含尖阁列岛做了确定。
但是,克罗里也说美国在相关的领土主权争议中保持中立,劝告日中和平解决领土问题。
自从1972年美国交还冲绳等离岛,尖阁列岛一直实际控制在日本政府手中,1960年日美安全合作条约文件第五条款适用于日本管辖的所有领土,美国发言人说。
到了9月,在9月13日的一次新闻发布会中,克罗里再次表达了:“希望日中双方通过对话和平解决领土问题“。“但是日美安保联盟是整个亚洲稳定的基石,并且这种安全和稳定有益于日本。”
 

                                         by mtjs


Thursday, Sept. 23, 201Q&A

Japan-China island tensions rise

The ins and outs of the spat over a Chinese fishing boat captain


By MASAMI ITOStaff writer

Tensions are growing daily over Japan's arrest of a Chinese fishing boat captain following his ship's collision with Japan Coast Guard vessels in the East China Sea.


Peaking pressure: The Uotsuri islet, part of a set of disputed islands in the East China Sea, is shown in this photo from a Maritime Self-Defense Force patrol plane on Sept. 15.KYODO PHOTO

Both countries have openly criticized each other over the incident, and the escalating diplomatic spat has led to public protests, the suspension of ministerial and higher-level exchanges, and the cancellation of a concert by pop group SMAP in Shanghai.

At the heart of the problem are a set of disputed islands in the East China Sea. Japan has administration of the islands, which it calls the Senkaku Islands, but both Beijing and Taiwan claim sovereignty as well, calling them the Diaoyu and Tiaoyutai, respectively. Following are basic questions and answers about the dispute:

Why was the Chinese captain arrested?

A JCG patrol vessel came across a Chinese fishing boat in Japanese-claimed territorial waters on the morning of Sept. 7.

After being warned to leave the area, the boat and JCG patrol ship Yonakuni collided. No details have yet been released as to who or what caused the collision. The Yonakuni then ordered the trawler to stop for inspection, which the Chinese captain refused, according to a JCG representative.

Later that morning, another JCG patrol ship, the Mizuki, was chasing the fishing boat to conduct an onboard inspection near Kuba Island when another collision occurred.

The Chinese captain, Zhan Qixiong, 41, was arrested the next day on suspicion of obstructing the public duties of coast guard personnel.

Japanese authorities are also looking into whether the captain engaged in unlawful fishing.

What is China's position on the collision?

In 1992, China enacted a territorial waters law that included the islands as part of its territory. Therefore, the application of any Japanese law in the area is unacceptable for Beijing.

From the beginning, the Chinese government has demanded that Japan release the captain, calling the arrest "illegal and invalid."

"We demand that the Japanese side immediately let the Chinese captain return unconditionally," Chinese Foreign Ministry representative Ma Zhaoxu said on the ministry's official website earlier this week. "If the Japanese side clings obstinately to its own course and doubles its mistakes, China will take strong countermeasures, for which Japan shall bear all the consequences."

What about the fishing boat captain?

The captain is being detained at the Ishigaki branch of the Naha District Public Prosecutor's Office. On Sunday, the Ishigaki Summary Court in Okinawa Prefecture gave prosecutors permission to extend Zhan's detention for another 10 days, until Sept. 29.

Beijing reacted immediately, suspending ministerial and higher-level exchanges with Japan.

Where are the islands?

The uninhabited islands are in the East China Sea. They occupy an area of only 7 sq. km, spread over what Japan calls Uotsuri, Kuba, Minami Kojima and other small islands about 170 km from both Taiwan and Ishigaki Island in Okinawa Prefecture.

The islands are under the administrative control of the Japanese government, which calls them the Senkaku Islands. China and Taiwan have both been claiming sovereignty since the 1970s. They call them the Diaoyu in China and the Tiaoyutai in Taiwan. They are often the source of diplomatic tension.

What is Japan's view of the dispute?

In 1885, during the Sino-Japanese War, Japan stated that it had conducted surveys that confirmed the islands were uninhabited and "showed no trace of having been under the control of China's Qing empire," the Foreign Ministry says on its website. In 1895, the Japanese government officially incorporated the territory as a part of Japan, and the islands became a part of Japan's southern archipelago, known as the Nanto Shoto. For the next four decades, small numbers of Japanese lived on the islands, building wharves and factories for processing dried bonito. The islets were later deserted in 1940.

After the war, the Nanto Shoto, including Okinawa and the Senkaku Islands, were captured by the United States and controlled under the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Okinawa was later returned to Japan in 1971. However, this agreement only ceded control of the disputed Senkaku Islands and did not directly determine sovereignty, argue China and Taiwan.

"There is no territorial dispute in the East China Sea," newly appointed Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara said. "The Senkaku Islands are an integral part of Japan's sovereign territory."

When and why did China and Taiwan begin to claim sovereignty over the islands?

Over the last 75 years, the two governments have held undefined positions on the Senkakus. The islands were handed over in an "unequal treaty" to Japan after China lost the First Sino-Japanese War in 1895.

In 1968 the United Nations Economic Commission for the Asia and the Far East reported potential oil reserves in the waters off the Senkakus. Both China and Taiwan officially declared sovereignty over the islands in 1971.

Haven't similar incidents occurred in Japan's territorial waters?

Yes. Japan Coast Guard Commandant Hisayasu Suzuki recently told a Diet committee that the JCG has conducted 21 inspections on foreign ships entering Japan's official territorial waters this year alone.

A similar situation occurred in 2004, when seven Chinese protesters were arrested for landing on one of the islands. The Japanese government, led by then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, deported the protesters to China.

China might expect the fishing boat captain to get similar treatment, given the nature of the dispute. But this time, this incident is being dealt with by prosecutors, not politicians.

How is Japan's security partner, the United States, responding to this incident?

In August, U.S. State Department spokesperson Philip Crowley told a news conference that the Japan-U.S. security alliance covers the Senkaku Islands. The treaty obliges the U.S. to defend Japan against an armed attack by another country.

But Crowley also has said that the U.S. has not taken any sides on the issue of sovereignty or the diplomatic row surrounding the collision, urging Japan and China to resolve the issue in a peaceful manner.

"The Senkaku Islands have been under the administrative control of the government of Japan since they were returned as part of the reversion of Okinawa in 1972. Article 5 of the 1960 U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security states that the treaty applies to the territories under the administration of Japan," he said in August.

At a separate news conference on Sept. 13, Crowley also said: "On this narrow issue, we hope that would be resolved peacefully through dialogue between China and Japan.

"But the U.S.-Japanese alliance is a cornerstone of security and stability across Asia, and that security and stability benefits Japan."